Taste vs Style vs Lane + Good Taste or Just Agreement? + Hobby Philosophy Deep Dive

The conversation continues to dig deeper as David Chase, Joe Poirot, Chris McGill, and Josh Adams take the idea of “taste” and push it to its limits. What starts as a simple definition quickly unravels into something much more complex: Is taste purely aesthetic… or does it include meaning, rarity, and intent? Can someone actually have “bad taste,” or is everything just subjective? Are we just saying “you have good taste” when someone likes what we like? The discussion introduces new layers: The difference between taste, style, and lane Whether being a “connoisseur” is about expertise… or perception How influence and exposure shape what we think is good There’s also a more uncomfortable angle explored: Can two people buy the exact same card… and one be doing it “in good taste” and the other not? Is collecting purely for money a lack of taste? Or is that just another valid lane in the hobby? The panel also gets into real examples: Why some collectors admire off-the-radar cards more than iconic grails How discovery and originality can signal taste more than price The role of content creators in shaping what the hobby sees as desirable And one of the key takeaways that emerges: Taste isn’t fixed. It evolves, it’s influenced, and sometimes it’s revealed only after you actually hold the card in your hands. This is one of the most philosophical segments of the entire show—and one that doesn’t try to land on a final answer. Enjoy the show? Follow or subscribe on your podcast platform so you don’t miss upcoming episodes. Pick up a copy of Pops & Comps on Amazon to better understand the supply and demand forces driving the sports card market. Take the Hobby Spectrum assessment at HobbySpectrum.com to discover your collector profile, join the directory, and connect with collectors who think and collect like you. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices