All episodes
CN PodcastEP 1669
1514 - PSA MK?
3/25/202610:44
0:00
-0:00
/ ABOUT THIS EPISODE
Dr. Beckett responds to Mike Lach’s question about why grading companies don’t apply an MK (mark) qualifier to post-production, in-person on-card autographs. He explains PSA’s early-1990s introduction of qualifiers (OC, MC, ST, MK, PD, OF) to note manufacturing related issues, and how MK indicates extraneous markings that lower the card’s value though the technical grade reflects centering, edges, corners, and surface(!). Dr. Beckett notes that autograph collecting and card grading were once separate, and that grading companies typically won’t slab cards with attempted or inauthentic autographs, often rejecting them rather than labeling them MK. He argues there should be a clearer solution—encapsulating cards as authentic while noting questionable or inauthentic signatures—to keep misleading items from remaining raw in the market.
01:01 Origins of PSA Qualifiers
02:51 How MK Affects Grade
04:05 Factory Flaws vs Marks
05:17 Autographs and Slabbing History
06:20 Inauthentic Autographs Problem
08:13 Why Slab Questionables
09:40 Personal Stories on Writing
/ MORE EPISODES
EP 79Inside the Allocation Chaos, Record Sales, and Sourcing Pressure in Today’s Hobby
EP 78The Luxury Upgrade Cards Have Been Missing | Brian Pirrip & M1nt
EP 77What PSA Hiring 1,000 Graders and Expansion Will Mean For the Hobby
EP 76Tyler “T-Pott” Nethercott: Why Grading Is More Inconsistent Than Collectors Want to Admit | Sports Card Investor
EP 75eBay rejected GameStop’s Takeover Proposal… What this means for the hobby
